Ask your product quality
data a question.
Ask in plain language whether a release is safe, what is holding stability back, or what failed and why. Zoe answers from your project’s own runs, scenarios and defects, and prepares drafts for your review.
Plain questions, answered from your data.
Open the assistant from any page, ask in your own words, and review whatever she drafts.
- Ask whether a release is safe, what is holding the stability reading back, or what failed and why
- She can draft a defect or a run, and you review and submit it
- She never submits, edits or deletes anything on her own
Project assistantZoe• Declined card shows no error on Safari (high)
• Invoice total is a cent off on discounted orders (medium)
Both break “A paid order always produces an invoice.”
Expected: a clear error. Seen: the page stays silent. Review and submit
Illustrative example.
Questions worth asking.
Examples of what you can put to Zoe today.
Is this release safe to ship?
A straight answer, with the failing checks and open defects behind it.
What is holding our stability reading back?
The signals dragging it down, and the scenarios behind them.
What failed in the last run, and how serious is it?
Each failure with its severity and the promise it breaks.
Which promises are at risk?
The scenarios with failing or inconsistent checks, in one list.
How often do we test checkout?
When it last ran, and which runs covered it.
Draft a defect for what just failed.
A ready draft for your team to review and submit.
What it does.
Get answers without searching through every run.
Ask whether a release is safe, which promises are at risk, or what happened in a particular finding. Zoe answers from the project’s own quality data, so you are not waiting for someone to pull it together.
Move from a question to a useful action.
Ask Zoe to draft a defect or a run. Review the proposed details and submit them when you’re ready.
Helpful, without taking over.
Zoe can read project information and prepare drafts, but she doesn’t independently submit, edit, or delete records. Your team remains in control.
An assistant that asks before acting.
Everything Qarmiq changes goes through a person. Zoe follows the same rule as the rest of the product.
She can read the project’s quality data to answer you. Changing it is always yours.
A defect or run she drafts is a starting point, handed to you to check and submit.
She answers about the project you are in, from its own runs, scenarios and defects.
It works with the rest.
Know the state of your product, not just the state of your tests.
A radar of eight measured signals gives a Stable, Watch or Unstable verdict, set by a rule rather than an average: five signals measure stability, and three show how much evidence the reading rests on. It covers the last 60 days.
See Insights → Defects and briefsEvery bug should come with a clear next step.
Defects carry severity, status, duplicates and attachments, linked to the scenario, check and run where they were found. An AI developer brief turns the captured evidence into something an engineer or a coding agent can act on.
See Defects and briefs → MCP serverGive your coding agent the context to build without breaking what works.
Qarmiq’s MCP server lets AI coding tools read project and defect context and write scenarios and checks, with an API key. Every write is planned, confirmed and logged.
See MCP server →See how naturally you can explore your product’s quality.
We will let you question a real project and see the answers for yourself.
Qarmiq is not self-serve yet, so we set each team up directly. Pricing is one flat price per project.