Every bug should come
with a clear next step.
Qarmiq connects a defect to the behavior it broke and the evidence that exposed it, giving developers and coding agents a clearer path to reproducing and investigating the issue.
A finding that explains itself.
The defect names the promise it breaks, and the brief is written from the evidence that was recorded.
- The brief covers what happened, what was expected, the steps to reproduce, the environment, what is still unknown and what to check next
- It can be copied as Markdown
- A manual test log highlights the failing requests and console errors
Where it stands. Sending findings out as issues, tickets or pull requests is on the roadmap.
The card is charged twice when Pay is double-clicked.
Breaks: A customer is never charged twice · Release 2.4 smoke run · Safari 18- HappenedTwo charges within one second of a double-click.
- ExpectedOne charge, and the button disabled after the first click.
- ReproduceSteps taken from the captured session.
- UnknownWhether the payment provider de-duplicates.
Illustrative example.
What it does.
Understand what went wrong.
Each defect links to the relevant scenario, check, and run. See the expected behavior alongside the observed failure and its supporting evidence.
Make the problem reproducible.
Captured steps, annotated screenshots, and relevant errors help the team understand how the issue occurred and what needs further investigation.
Give your coding agent the context to help.
Generate a developer brief from the captured evidence, including what happened, what was expected, how to reproduce the issue, and what remains unknown.
A finding is a broken promise, not a stack trace.
Because every defect is tied to a scenario and a check, a developer reads it as what must hold and did not.
Each defect points at the scenario, check and run where it was found, so severity is read against what it breaks.
Qarmiq compares new findings with ones already raised, including dismissed ones, and does not raise them again.
Developers and their AI coding agents pull the full finding into their editor over MCP.
It works with the rest.
Make every manual test more useful.
A small widget in your own app. Testers test as they normally do, record pass or fail and file defects in place, while Witness keeps the evidence of everything they do.
See Witness → MCP serverGive your coding agent the context to build without breaking what works.
Qarmiq’s MCP server lets AI coding tools read project and defect context and write scenarios and checks, with an API key. Every write is planned, confirmed and logged.
See MCP server → Runs and verdictsKnow exactly what passed, what failed, and where.
A run tests a fixed set of scenarios on one environment, across several browsers, and records pass, fail, blocked or skipped for each check. It keeps the exact wording it tested.
See Runs and verdicts →See how Qarmiq turns a failure into an actionable finding.
We will walk a real defect from the broken promise to the brief your agent would start from.
Qarmiq is not self-serve yet, so we set each team up directly. Pricing is one flat price per project.